HK Cap. 112AG — Specification of Arrangements (Government of the Republic of Estonia Concerning Air Services) (Double Taxation) Order

Specification of Arrangements (Government of the Republic of Estonia Concerning Air Services) (Double Taxation) Order ( Cap. 112, section 49 ) (Enacting provision omitted— E.R. 5 of 2020 ) [6 July 2001] (Format changes— E.R. 5 of 2020 ) 1. Declaration under section 49 For the purposes of section 49 of the Ordinance, it is declared that the arrangements referred to in section 2 have been made with the Government of the Republic of Estonia with a view to affording relief from double taxation in relation to income tax and any tax of a similar character imposed by the laws of the Republic, and that it is expedient that those arrangements should have effect. 2. Arrangements specified The arrangements mentioned in section 1 are in Article 9 of the Agreement between the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of Estonia concerning Air Services done in duplicate at Tallinn on 30 April 2001 in the English language as specified in the Schedule and having effect according to the tenor of that Agreement. Schedule [ s. 2 ] Article 9 of the Agreement between the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of Estonia Concerning Air Services “ ARTICLE 9 Avoidance of Double Taxation (1) Income or profits derived from the operation of aircraft in international traffic by an airline of one Contracting Party, including participation in a pool service, a joint air transport operation or an international operating agency, which are subject to tax in the area of that Contracting Party shall be exempt from income tax, profits tax and all other taxes on income or profits imposed in the area of the other Contracting Party. (2) Capital and assets of an airline of one Contracting Party relating to the operation of aircraft in international traffic shall be exempt from taxes of every kind and description on capital and assets imposed in the area of the other Contracting Party. (3) Gains from the alienation of aircraft operated in international traffic and movable property pertaining to the operation of such aircraft which are received by an airline of one Contracting Party shall be exempt from any tax on gains imposed in the area of the other Contracting Party. (4) For the purposes of this Article: (a) the term “ income or profits ” includes revenues and gross receipts from the operation of aircraft for the carriage of persons, livestock, goods, mail or merchandise in international traffic including: (i) the charter or rental of aircraft; (ii) the sale of tickets or similar documents, and the provision of services connected with such carriage, either for the airline itself or for any other airline; and (iii) interest on funds directly connected with the operation of aircraft in international traffic; (b) the term “ international traffic ” means any carriage by an aircraft except when such carriage is solely between places in the area of the other Contracting Party; (c) the term “ airline of one Contracting Party ” means, in the case of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, an airline incorporated and having its principal place of business in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and, in the case of Estonia, an airline substantially owned and effectively controlled by the Government of Estonia or its nationals; (d) the term “ competent authority ” means, in the case of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Commissioner of Inland Revenue or his authorized representative, or any person or body authorized to perform any functions at present exercisable by the Commissioner or similar functions, and, in the case of Estonia, National Tax Board or their authorized representative. (5) The competent authorities of the Contracting Parties shall, through consultation, endeavour to resolve by mutual agreement any disputes regarding the interpretation or application of this Article. Article 17 (Settlement of Disputes) shall not apply to any such dispute. (6) Notwithstanding Article 21 (Entry into Force) each Contracting Party shall notify to the other the completion of the procedures required by its law for the bringing into force of this Article and the Article shall enter into force on the date of the last written notification. The Article shall then be applied: (a) in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, for any year of assessment beginning on or after 1st April in the calendar year next following that in which this Agreement or this Article enters into force, whichever is the later; (b) in Estonia, for any year of assessment beginning on or after 1st January in the calendar year next following that in which this Agreement or this Article enters into force, whichever is the later. (7) Notwithstanding Article 19 (Termination) where notice of termination of this Agreement is given by one of the Contracting Parties in writing under that Article, this Article shall cease to have effect: (a) in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, for any year of assessment beginning on or after 1st April in the calendar year next following that in which notice is given; (b) in Estonia, for any year of assessment beginning on or after 1st January in the calendar year next following that in which notice is given. (8) This Article shall cease to have effect in the event that an agreement for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income, providing for similar exemptions to those in this Article, enters into force between the Contracting Parties.”.