Beta
IPA trademark 7.-examples-of-invalid-series-trade-marks
IPA trademark 7.-examples-of-invalid-series-trade-marks — IP Australia Trade Marks Manual of Practice and Procedure – 13.7. Examples of Invalid Series Trade Marks
Beta. Legal information, not legal advice. LEGALDIGM is not a law firm. Check the official source for the current text.
Trade Marks Act 1995
Trade Mark Regulations 1995
7.1 Examples of trade marks that do not resemble each other in material particulars
The below are examples of invalid series, because the trade marks do not resemble each other in material particulars. The differences are such that they affect the identity of the trade marks when each member of the series is compared to each of the others.
Trade marks
Example 1
IDAK MELBOURNE
IDAK SYDNEY
The large difference in the relative size of the words in each trade mark significantly changes the prominence of the shared IDAK, as well as the overall visual impression.
Example 2
Class 25: Clothing.
Firstly, GALAXY is not a “name of a place”, and therefore is not a section 51(1)(b) statement. Moreover, GALAXY is distinctive on clothing (it has no ordinary descriptive relevance, unlike MELBOURNE), and is a visually prominent part of the mark (being larger than IDAK). As a result, it is likely to be taken as an identifying feature.
Example 3
SYDNEY CLOTHING;
MELBOURNE CLOTHING
Class 25: Clothing.
The trade marks differ only by a statement as to “names of places” (s 51(1)(b)). However, the shared word CLOTHING is purely descriptive of the claimed goods, and is at the end of two purely descriptive phrases. CLOTHING is not likely to be taken by consumers as an identifying feature of these trade marks. Therefore, they do not resemble each other in material particulars.
7.2 Examples of trade marks that differ in ways other than those allowed in paragraphs 51(1)(a), (b) or (c)
Although all of the below trade marks may resemble each other in material particulars, the ways in which they differ are not specified in paragraph 51(1)(a),(b) or (c) .
Trade marks
Example 1
;
Example 2
Example 3
IDAKS
IDAKZ
Example 4
IDAK VIEW
IDAKVIEW
Example 5
51(1) (a) The following are examples of invalid series containing differences that do not qualify under paragraph 51(1)(a) as statements or representations as to the goods or services in relation to which the trade marks are to be used .
Trade marks
Comments
Example 1
IDAK ACCOUNTING
IDAK MEDICAL
Class 35: Accounting
Examples 1 and 2 include words that do not indicate the goods/services in relation to which the trade marks are to be used - MEDICAL and REPAIRS
Example 2
IDAK REPAIRS
IDAK REFRIGERATORS
Class 11: Refrigerators
51(1) (b) The following are examples of invalid series containing differences that do not qualify under paragraph 51(1)(b) as statements or representations as to number, price, quality or names of places .
Trade marks
Comments
Number
Example 1
IDAK 2
IDAK TWICE
TWICE is not a statement or representation as to number, ie. it does not include a number (TWO or 2) per se.
Example 2
IDAK 6 pack
IDAK Unlimited
UNLIMITED is not a statement or representation as to number.
Price
Example 3
IDAK £
IDAK $
IDAK ¥
The symbols refer to currency rather than price.
Quality
Example 4
IDAK DELUXE
IDAK BEGINNING
BEGINNING is not a statement or representation as to quality.
Example 5
Class 30: Tea/coffee
IDAK PREMIUM
IDAK WEATHER PROOF
WEATHER PROOF is not a statement or representation as to quality in relation to tea/coffee
Names of Places
Example 6
IDAK MELBOURNE
IDAK EAST
East is not the name of a place
Example 7
IDAK GOLD COAST
IDAK REGIONAL
Regional is not the name of a place
51(1)(c) The following are examples of invalid series containing differences that do not qualify under paragraph 51(1)(c) as the colour of any part of the trade mark
Trade marks
Comments
Example
IDAK BLUE;
IDAK RED
Class 45: pet-sitting services
The words RED and BLUE here are not the colour of any part of the trade mark. They are also not statement as to the services, which are not ordinarily described in terms of colour
7.3 Trade marks which resemble each other in material particulars, and differ in one or more of the ways specified in paragraphs 51(1)(a),(b) or (c), but incorporate a further change that renders them an invalid series.
Trade marks
Difference that is not allowed
Example 1
IDAK 1
IDAKS 2
Differences in spelling
Example 2
IDAK CLOTHING
idak FOOTWEAR
Use of upper and lower case letters
Example 3
IDAK 1
IDAK 2
Underline
Example 4
IDAK $2.00
IDAC $10.00
Differences in spelling
Example 5
IDAK STANDARD
I DAK DELUXE
Separation of word
