Beta
IPA trademark 4.6-classification-of-goods-and-services
IPA trademark 4.6-classification-of-goods-and-services — IP Australia Trade Marks Manual of Practice and Procedure – 60.4.6 Classification of Goods and Services
Beta. Legal information, not legal advice. LEGALDIGM is not a law firm. Check the official source for the current text.
4.6.1 Relevant Legislation
Madrid Protocol
Article 3(2) International Applications
Madrid Protocol Regulations
Rule 12 Irregularities With Respect to the Classification of Goods and Services
Rule 13 Irregularities With Respect to the Indication of Goods and Services
Trade Marks Regulations 1995
Schedule 1 Classification of goods and services
Reg 3.1 Classification of goods and services
Reg 4.2 Application in approved form - requirements for filing
Reg 4.4 Specification of goods and/or services
Reg 17A.14 Specification of goods and services (IR)
Reg 17A.14A Representation of trade marks
Trade Marks Office Manual of Practice and Procedure
Part 14 Classification of Goods and Services
4.6.2 General Description
The IB checks the goods and/or services meet their classification requirements before registering an application for an international trade mark.
The goods and/or services claimed in an IRDA must accord with the Nice Classification system (see 2.2.3 Requirements for the International Application Form ). IP Australia has the right to object to terms that are considered too vague for the purposes of classification, are considered to be incomprehensible or linguistically incorrect or which are otherwise not acceptable under Australian trade mark legislation, such as the phrase "all goods in this class". (See Reg 17A.14).
The Madrid Protocol (Article 3(2)) stipulates that the IB exercises control as to the classification of goods and services and in the event of a dispute between an Office of origin and the IB, the opinion of the latter shall prevail.
The goods and/or services must comply with the Nice Classification System and will have been checked, and amended if necessary, by the IB prior to transmission of the international registration to IP Australia.
In the case of claims that have vague terms, are incomprehensible or linguistically incorrect, a provisional refusal may be issued, and the holder will be asked to explain or limit the claim. If there is no response from the holder, the terms will be refused (see 4.14 Acceptance and 4.18 Protection).
