Beta
IPA trademark 1.-introduction8
IPA trademark 1.-introduction8 — IP Australia Trade Marks Manual of Practice and Procedure – Part 23.1. Introduction
Beta. Legal information, not legal advice. LEGALDIGM is not a law firm. Check the official source for the current text.
Trade Marks Act 1995
Trade Mark Regulations 1995
Trade marks that are not capable of distinguishing the applicant's goods or services from the goods or services of other persons must be rejected.
Where an examiner considers that a trade mark is not sufficiently inherently adapted to distinguish, they must advise the applicant whether the trade mark falls for consideration under s 41(3) (namely, that the trade mark is not to any extent inherently adapted to distinguish) or s 41(4) (namely, that the trade mark is to some extent, but not sufficiently, inherently adapted to distinguish). The applicant has several options to respond, including:
filing legal arguments that the examiner’s objection is incorrect or should not apply to all of the goods and/or services
amending the specification of goods and/or services to remove those in respect of which the objection applies
providing formal evidence of use of the trade mark
supplying any relevant information, including about the relevant industry or market that supports legal arguments or gives appropriate context to evidence of use
advising of any other circumstances that might make it appropriate for the Registrar to accept the trade mark.
Any submission should be provided in an electronic format via Online Services. IP Australia does not routinely accept physical documents or exhibits so clear representations of any relevant evidence should be filed.
