LEGALDIGMLEGALDIGM
    ← Australia
    Beta
    IPA trademark 1.-introduction-to-section-44-and-regulation-4.15a

    IPA trademark 1.-introduction-to-section-44-and-regulation-4.15a — IP Australia Trade Marks Manual of Practice and Procedure – 26.1. Introduction to section 44 and regulation 4.15A

    Beta. Legal information, not legal advice. LEGALDIGM is not a law firm. Check the official source for the current text.

    Section 44 is intended to prevent registration of trade marks if the use of the two trade marks in the market would likely lead to confusion. Under s 44(1) or (2), an application for a trade mark must be rejected if the applicant's trade mark is substantially identical with or deceptively similar to: a trade mark registered by another person in respect of similar goods or closely related services, or similar services or closely related goods; OR a trade mark whose registration is being sought by another person in respect of similar goods or closely related services or similar services or closely related goods; AND the priority date of the applicant's trade mark is not earlier than the priority date of the other trade mark in respect of the similar goods or closely related services, or the similar services or closely related goods. The two key enquiries under s 44 are whether the respective trade marks are substantially identical or deceptively similar, and whether the respective goods/services are similar or closely related. A ground for rejection can be raised regardless of whether the earlier trade mark is registered or is subject of a pending application. Section 44 allows co-existence of substantially identical or deceptively similar trade marks for dissimilar or unrelated goods and services. Section 44  itself makes no reference to International Registrations Designating Australia (IRDAs) or Protected International Trade Marks (PITMs). Provision for considering a PITM or IRDA as a ground for rejection against a national filed application is made under  regulation 4.15A  which mirrors the requirements of section 44.   When an earlier conflicting PITM or IRDA acts as a barrier to the acceptance of a national filed mark, grounds for rejection are therefore raised under  regulation 4.15A .  Provision is made under  subregulations 4.15A(3) and 4.15A(5)  for the acceptance of trade marks which would otherwise be rejected under  subregulations 4.15A(1) and 4.15A(2) .   Given the similar operation and effect of the two provisions, a reference to s 44 in the rest of this Part is to be also taken as a reference to regulation 4.15A.   The provisions of  subsections 44(3) and (4)  may, in certain circumstances, also permit the acceptance of trade marks which would otherwise be rejected under  subsections 44(1) and (2). Part 28 Honest Concurrent Use, Prior Use and Other Circumstances

    Related guides, FAQ and contract templates