Beta
IPA patent 5.7.5.2-definition-of-obvious-mistake
IPA patent 5.7.5.2-definition-of-obvious-mistake — IP Australia Patent Manual of Practice and Procedure – 5.7.5.2 Definition of obvious mistake
Beta. Legal information, not legal advice. LEGALDIGM is not a law firm. Check the official source for the current text.
Also in this Chapter:
5.7.5.1 Definition of clerical error
5.7.5.3 Evidence required to prove a clerical error or obvious mistake
On this page
Overview
Examination practice .
Overview
An obvious mistake is one where a reader of the specification can clearly identify that a mistake has occurred, that a reader would have no difficulty in knowing what was intended, and what the correction would be.
Examination practice
It can be difficult to know what was intended. For example, while it may be clearly apparent that a sheet of the specification is missing, it may not be obvious what sheet should have been there in the first place.
The correction of ‘obvious mistakes’ should not be used to cover errors of judgement by the person who drafted the specification. Such errors would not be obvious to the public.
A correction can be expressed in multiple ways, as long as the meaning of the correction is the same as the meaning originally intended.
Subsequent research does not make something an ‘obvious mistake’ if it was believed to be correct at the time of drafting. For example, an application was filed for a chemical compound defined by its structure. Subsequent research found the structure to be incorrect, but amendment of the new structure was not allowed as it was not an obvious mistake at the time of drafting.
