Beta
IPA design citation-index
IPA design citation-index — IP Australia Designs Examiners' Manual – Citation index
Beta. Legal information, not legal advice. LEGALDIGM is not a law firm. Check the official source for the current text.
2. APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited [2021] ADO 1
2.7
4. FORMALITIES ASSESSMENT
Keller v LED Technologies Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 55
4.1
8. EXAMINATION
Hindi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 20 FCR 1
8.8
British Sky Broadcasting v Registrar of Trade Marks 58 IPR 216
8.11
9. IDENTIFYING THE DESIGN
Review No 2 v Redberry Enterprises [2008] FCA 1588
9.2
Firmagroup Australia Pty Ltd v Byrne & Davidson Doors (Vic) Pty Ltd (1987) 180 CLR 483
9.3
Reckitt Benckiser (UK) 76 IPR 781
9.4
Apple Inc [2017] ADO 6
9.4
10. PRODUCT
Microsoft Corporation [2008] ADO 2
10.3
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited [2021] ADO 1
10.7
Bondor v National Panels 23 IPR 289
10.9
Brisbane Aluminium v Techni Interiors 23 IPR 107
10.9
12. SECTION 43 REFUSAL TO REGISTER
JIMMY DIOGUARDI [2013] ADO 5
12.4
Jabree Ltd v Gold Coast Commonwealth Games Corporation [2017] ATMO 156
12.5
13. ASSESSING NEWNESS AND DISTINCTIVENESS
Microsoft Corporation [2008] ADO 2
13.2
LED Technologies v Elecspess [2008] FCA 1941
13.4
Woodhouse UK v Architectural Lighting Systems [2006] RPC 1
13.7
Hunter Pacific International Pty Ltd v Martec Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 796
13.7
World of Technologies (Aust) Pty Ltd v Tempo (Aust) Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 114
13.7
Bitzer Kuehlmaschinenbau GmbH [2015] ADO 1
13.7
Gramophone Company Limited v Magazine Holder Company (1910) 27 RPC 152
13.7
Ferrero’s Design [1978] RPC 473
13.7
LED Technologies v Elecspess [2008] FCA 1941
13.7
Reckitt Benckiser Inc [2008] ADO 1
13.8
Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2008] ADO 6
13.8
Review No 2 v Redberry Enterprises [2008] FCA 1588
13.8
14. SECTION 19 REQUIREMENTS FOR DISTINCTIVENESS
Manitowoc Foodservice Companies LLC [2013] ADO 2
14.2
Astra Zeneca AB [2007] ADO 4
14.2
Icon Plastics Pty Ltd [2007] ADO 2
14.2
Bitzer Kuehlmaschinenbau GmbH [2015] ADO 1
14.2
Sportservice Pty Ltd [2007] ADO 6
14.2
World of Technologies v Tempo [2007] FCA 114
14.2
Hunter Pacific International Pty Ltd v Martec Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 796
14.5
Bitzer Kuehlmaschinenbau GmbH [2015] ADO 1
14.6
Colgate-Palmolive Company [2011] ADO 1
14.6
White Motor Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd v McConnell Seats Australia Pty Ltd [2018] ADO 1
14.6
Manitowoc Foodservice Companies LLC [2012] ADO 3
14.6
15. STATEMENT OF NEWNESS AND DISTINCTIVENESS
Reckitt Benckiser Inc [2008] ADO 1
15.4
16. STANDARD OF THE INFORMED USER
Multisteps Pty Ltd v Source & Sell Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 743
16.1
Ferrari S.P.A v Dansk Supermarket A/ S R0084/2007-2, 25 January 2008
16.2
Mars UK Limited v Paragon Products BV , R1391/2006-3, 25 January 2008
16.2
Apple Computer Inc [2007] ADO 5
16.3
LED Technologies v Elecspess [2008] FCA 1941
16.4
Review No 2 v Redberry Enterprises [2008] FCA 1588
16.4
Woodhouse UK v Architectural Lighting Systems [2006] RPC 1
16.4
Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) [2008] FSR 8
16.4
Multisteps Pty Ltd v Source & Sell Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 743
16.5
LED Technologies v Elecspess [2008] FCA 1941
16.6
Apple Computer Inc [2007] ADO 5
16.6
Reckitt Benckiser Inc [2008] ADO 1
16.6
17. PRIOR ART BASE
LED Technologies v Elecspess [2008] FCA 1941
17.1
Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd (1968) 1A IPR 586
17.3
Key Logic Pty Ltd v Sun-Wizard Holding Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 208
17.3
Key Logic Pty Ltd (2017) ADO 8
17.3
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi [1980] 31 ALR 666
17.5
E. & J. Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [2008] FCA 934
17.5
Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited [2019] FCA 1662
17.5
18. PRIOR PUBLICATION OR USE EXCEPTION
Chiropedic Bedding Pty Ltd v Radburg Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1869
18.2
Chiropedic Bedding Pty Ltd v Radburg Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 142
18.2
Allen Hardware Products v Tclip [2008] ADO 8
18.3
Stack v Brisbane City Council 32 IPR 69
18.4
Icon Plastics Pty Ltd [2007] ADO 2
18.4
Artisent, LLC [2017] ADO 3
18.5
State of Escape Accessories Pty Limited v Schwartz [2020] FCA 160
18.5
Burge v Swarbrick [2007] HCA 17
18.5
Water Recreations v Fairmile [1982] 42 ALR 273
18.5
Grundt v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd [1937] 59 CLR 641
18.5
21. SATISFIED
Sportservice Pty Ltd [2007] ADO 6
21.4
22. AMENDMENTS
A.B. Volvo's Application (1983) 1 IPR 554
22.4
AMP Incorporated v Commissioner of Patents (1974) AOJP 3224
22.4
Chris Ford Enterprises Pty Ltd v. B. H. & J. R. Badenhop Pty Ltd (1985) 4 IPR 485
22.4
Ethyl Corporation's Patent (1972) RPC 169
22.4
The Distillers Co Ltd’s Application (1953) 70 RPC 221
22.5
Invacare Corporation [2013] ADO 4
22.5
23. EXTENSIONS OF TIME
Sanyo Electric Co Ltd and the Commissioner of Patents (1996) 36 IPR 470
23.2
Chalk v Commissioner for Superannuation (1994) 50 FCR 150
23.2
Scaniainventor v Commissioner of Patents (1981) 36 ALR 101
23.2
Danby Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents and Another (1988) 12 IPR 151
23.2
Norman Stibbard v The Commissioner of Patents (1986) 7 IPR 337
23.2
G S Technology Pty Limited and Commissioner of Patents and Anor [2004] AATA 1391
23.2
Total Peripherals Pty Ltd v IBM & Commissioner of Patents (1998) AATA 784
23.2
Kimberly-Clark Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (No 3) (1988) 13 IPR 569
23.2
G S Technology Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents (2004) 63 IPR 9
23.2
Re Sanyo Electric Co Ltd and the Commissioner of Patents (1996) 36 IPR 470
23.2
R Thomas & A Garnham v Jeijing Pty Ltd (1994) 29 IPR 441
23.3
Jiejing Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents & Ors (1995) AIPC 91-144
23.3
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Amgen, Inc [1997] APO 69
23.3
Jiejing Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents & Ors (1995) AIPC 91-144
23.3
R Thomas & A Garnham v Jeijing Pty Ltd (1994) 29 IPR 441
23.3
Kmart Australia Limited [2011] ADO 2
23.4
Jiejing Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents and Ron Thomas and Allan Garnham (1995) AIPC 91-144
23.5
Vrubel v Upham (1996) 36 IPR 220
23.5
Reilly v Commissioner of Patents (1996) 36 IPR 314
23.5
Board of Control of Michigan Technological University v Deputy Commissioner (High Court appeal) (1982) AIPC 90-005
23.5
Rohrmoster v Registrar of Trade Marks (1987) 7 IPR 551
23.5
Abbott & Lamb Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (1991) AIPC 90-806
23.5
Jiejing Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents and Ron Thomas and Allan Garnham (1995) AIPC 91-144
23.5
Solar Mesh Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (1995) AIPC 91-138
23.5
Sanyo Electric Co Ltd and the Commissioner of Patents (1996) 36 IPR 470
23.6
Kimberly-Clark Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (No 3) (1988) 13 IPR 569
23.6
G S Technology Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents (2004) 63 IPR 9
23.6
Sanyo v Commissioner of Patents (1996) 36 IPR 470
23.6
Ferocem Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (1994) 28 IPR 243
23.6
A Goninan & Co Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (1997) 38 IPR 213
23.6
New Clear Water Pty Ltd v Atlantis Corporation Pty Ltd [2001] APO 48
23.6
Chalk v Commissioner for Superannuation (1994) 50 FCR 150
23.6
Comcare v A’Hearn (1993) 119 ALR 85
23.6
New Horticulture Pty Ltd v Enviro Pak Pty Ltd [2016] ADO 2
23.6
Pacrim Trading Co Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd [2007] ADO 3
23.7
Harrison v Theo [1998] ADO 2
23.7
HRC Project Design Pty Ltd v Orford Pty Ltd [1997] APO 12; 38 IPR 121
23.7
G & J Koutsoukos Holdings Pty Ltd v Capral Aluminium Limited [2003] APO 28
23.8
International Business Machines Corporation v Total Peripherals [2002] APO 44
23.8
Kimberly-Clark Corp v Proctor & Gamble Co. (1992) AIPC 90-869
23.10
The University of Newcastle Research Associates Limited [2001] APO 64
23.11
Reilly v Commissioner of Patents (1996) 36 IPR 314
23.11
24. ASSIGNMENTS AND OTHER INTERESTS
George Stack v State of Queensland [1996] 739 FCA 1
24.3
Westpac Banking Corp v Dawson (1990) 8 ACLC 681
24.3
Reilly v Commissioner of Patents (1996) 36 IPR 314
24.4
25. OWNERSHIP DISPUTES
Application by O’Neill and St George 30 IPR 637
25.2
Application by Willems, Fritz, et al 21 IPR 569
25.2
Stephenson v Donner 24 IPR 108 (1992) AIPC 90-888
25.2
Carroll v Harper 1 IPR 537
25.2
Tribe v Ranken 1 IPR 561
25.2
Milward-Bason and Burgess (1988) AIPC 90-475
25.2
Allen Hardware Products Pty Ltd v Tclip Pty Ltd [2008] ADO 7
25.4
Metroll Queensland Pty Ltd v Mark Nicholas Collymore, Courier Pete Pty Ltd [2008] ADO 9
25.4
Craige Jonathan Henrick v Richard Eaton Taplin and Craige Jonathan Henrick [2009] ADO 1
25.4
Extreme Kayaks & Watersports Pty Ltd v Viking Kayak International Pty Ltd [2010] ADO 1
25.4
Australian Fitness Supplies Pty Ltd v Rasheed Rane [2013] ADO 6
25.4
John Michael Jarvie v Comtec Industries Pty Ltd [2018] ADO 5
25.4
Manuel Canestrini v Ilan El [2020] ADO 2
25.4
Somnomed Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCA 765
25.5
Metroll Queensland Pty Ltd v Mark Nicholas Collymore, Courier Pete Pty Ltd [2008] ADO 9
25.6
Spencer Industries v Collin s [2003] FCA 542, 58 IPR 425
25.6
Pancreas Technologies Pty Ltd v The State of Queensland acting through Queensland Health [2005] APO 1
25.6
Eddie Kwan, John Pierre Le Sands and Paul N Van Draanen v The Queensland Corrective Services Commission and The Queensland Spastic Welfare League [1994] APO 53; (1994) AIPC 91-113; 31 IPR 25
25.6
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation et al [1995] APO 16; 31 IPR 67; (1995) AIPC 91-171
25.6
Allen Hardware Products Pty Ltd v Tclip Pty Ltd [2008] ADO 8
25.6
John Michael Jarvie v Comtec Industries Pty Ltd [2018] ADO 5
25.7
Manuel Canestrini v Ilan El [2020] ADO 2
25.7
Somnomed Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCA 765
25.7
Airsense Technology Ltd v Vision Systems Ltd 62 IPR 409; 62 IPR 413
25.7
Glass Block Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Armourglass Australia Pty Ltd [2005] ADO 1
25.7
George Stack v Davies Shephard Pty Ltd and GSA Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd [1996] APO 1; (1996) AIPC 91-241; 34 IPR 117
25.7
Costa v G R and I E Daking Pty Ltd (1994) 29 IPR 241
25.7
Allen Hardware Products Pty Ltd v Tclip Pty Ltd [2008] ADO 8
25.7
26. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS UNDER S 61(1)
Secton and Vortoil v Delawood and Ors (Supreme Court of Victoria, unpublished)
26.4
Magee v Farrell (1986) AIPC 90-296
26.4
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften EV & anor v Amgen Inc (1998) AIPC 91-434
26.4
Davies v Eli Lilly & Co (1987) 1 All ER 801
26.5
Dennis Gravolin and Trailer Vision Pty Ltd v Locmac Holdings Pty Ltd as trustee for Locmac Trust [2007] ADO 7
26.6
Brisalebe v Searle 30 IPR 91, (1994) AIPC 91-088
26.6
Davies v Eli Lilly & Co. (1987) 1 All ER 801
26.6
Magee v Farrell (1986) AIPC 90-296
26.6
Secton and Vortoil v Delawood and others (Supreme Court of Victoria, unpublished)
26.6
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften EV & anor v Amgen Inc (1998) AIPC 91-434
26.6
28. HEARINGS
Data dot v Alpha MicroTech (2004) 59 IPR 402
28.4
Cadbury UK Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks [2008] FCA 1126
28.4
