Beta
ASIC RG 128
ASIC RG 128 — ASIC Regulatory Guide – RG 128 Collective action by investors
Beta. Legal information, not legal advice. LEGALDIGM is not a law firm. Check the official source for the current text.
Page 1
REGULATORY GUIDE 128
Collective action by investors
July 2026
About this guide
This guide is for investors who wish to cooperate with each other in relation
to their investment in a listed company, listed bodies (other than notified
foreign passport funds) or a listed registered scheme.
It provides guidance to promote investor engagement on corporate
governance issues. It also identifies circumstances where acting together
may lead to investors becoming associates or entering into a relevant
agreement for the purposes of the takeover and substantial holding
provisions of the Corporations Act.
Page 2
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 2
About ASIC regulatory documents
In administering legislation ASIC issues the following types of regulatory
documents.
Consultation papers: seek feedback from stakeholders on matters ASIC
is considering, such as proposed relief or proposed regulatory guidance.
Regulatory guides: give guidance to regulated entities by:
explaining when and how ASIC will exercise specific powers under
legislation (primarily the Corporations Act)
explaining how ASIC interprets the law
describing the principles underlying ASIC’s approach
giving practical guidance (e.g. describing the steps of a process such
as applying for a licence or giving practical examples of how
regulated entities may decide to meet their obligations).
Information sheets: provide concise guidance on a specific process or
compliance issue or an overview of detailed guidance.
Reports: describe ASIC compliance or relief activity or the results of a
research project.
Document history
This guide was issued in July 2026 and is based on legislation and
regulations as at the date of issue.
Previous versions:
Superseded Regulatory Guide 128, issued June 2015
Superseded Policy Statement 128, issued January 1998, reissued
July 1998 and rebadged as a regulatory guide 5 July 2007.
Disclaimer
This guide does not constitute legal advice. We encourage you to seek your
own professional advice to find out how the Corporations Act and other
applicable laws apply to you, as it is your responsibility to determine your
obligations.
Examples in this guide are purely for illustration; they are not exhaustive and
are not intended to impose or imply particular rules or requirements.
Page 3
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 3
Contents
A Overview ........................................................................................... 4
Balancing the benefits of engagement against the risk of
inappropriate acquisition of control .................................................... 4
Purpose of this guide ......................................................................... 5
Scope of this guide ............................................................................ 6
B Permissible and prohibited conduct ............................................. 7
The takeover and substantial holding provisions............................... 7
Collective action conduct ................................................................. 11
Consequences of problematic collective action............................... 14
Relief ................................................................................................ 17
C Additional legal considerations ................................................... 18
Issues for investors to consider ....................................................... 18
Issues for entities to consider .......................................................... 19
Key terms ............................................................................................... 21
Related information ............................................................................... 22
Page 4
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 4
A Overview
Key points
Effective investor engagement can enhance corporate governance and the
long-term performance and corporate value of a listed entity.
In some instances, the Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act) can
present obstacles to investors cooperating, as engagement of this kind may
require lodgement of substantial holding notices or result in a breach of the
takeover provisions of the Corporations Act.
Section B of this guide provides guidance on the likely legal effect of
different types of collective action by investors and whether these may
constitute unacceptable circumstances. It also provides guidance on our
approach to enforcement of the takeover and substantial holding provisions
in the context of investor engagement.
Section C of this guide identifies some other legal issues that investors and
entities need to consider in relation to investor engagement.
Balancing the benefits of engagement against the risk of
inappropriate acquisition of control
RG 128.1 A fundamental principle of corporate governance is that investors should be
able to hold the board—and, through the board, management—to account
for the entity’s performance. To do so, investors need to engage with the
entity.
RG 128.2 Investor engagement can take many different forms and investors may wish
to engage with entities in a variety of ways, either individually or
collectively. We recognise that investors should be allowed to cooperate and
coordinate their actions concerning an entity in which they have invested, in
the interests of promoting long-term value for all investors. At times, this
type of engagement can be more effective and efficient than individual
investor engagement.
RG 128.3 However, there is a difference between investors expressing views and
promoting appropriate discipline in entity decision making and investors
effectively taking control of entity decision making. Regulatory support for
collective action by investors must recognise that the takeover and
substantial holding provisions place limits on cooperation between investors
to avoid control over an entity being acquired inappropriately.
Page 5
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 5
Takeover and substantial holding provisions
RG 128.4 We recognise the importance of the underlying purposes of the takeover and
substantial holding provisions, as set out in s602 of the Corporations Act.
The aims of these provisions include, in broad terms, ensuring:
(a) transparency to the market about those persons who control an entity; and
(b) that all investors are provided with equal opportunities to consider and
benefit from control proposals.
Note: In this guide, references to chapters (Chs), parts (Pts) or sections (s) are to the
Corporations Act (as notionally modified by ASIC relief, where relevant), unless
otherwise specified.
RG 128.5 Investors acting collectively to surreptitiously obtain a substantial stake in or
illegitimately obtain control over an entity can negatively affect the entity
and the position of other investors in the entity.
RG 128.6 Investors concerned about common issues may become ‘associates’ or be
regarded as having entered into a ‘relevant agreement’ for the purposes of
the takeover or substantial holding provisions. This is because these
provisions are not only concerned with the power of individual investors in
relation to the voting and disposal of shares in companies or interests in
registered schemes, but also the aggregated voting power of groups of
investors who are either related or associated with each other in relation to
some aspect of the entity’s affairs.
RG 128.7 Depending on the aggregated voting power of the group, investors acting
collectively in this way may be required to lodge substantial holding notices
relating to the group, may be prohibited from acquiring further interests in
the entity under the takeover prohibition in s606 or may even breach the
takeover provisions.
Purpose of this guide
RG 128.8 The purpose of this guide is to provide guidance on how the takeover and
substantial holding provisions apply to collective action by investors and to
provide more clarity on when we will consider that collective action may
constitute unacceptable circumstances despite not contravening those
provisions.
RG 128.9 Our aims in providing this guidance are to:
(a) encourage collective action by investors that can promote corporate
governance improvements for the long-term benefit of an entity and its
investors. Many forms of this action may occur without giving rise to
any contravention of the Corporations Act or other unacceptable
circumstances; and
Page 6
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 6
(b) deter investors from undertaking collective action that is not consistent
with the letter or spirit of the takeover and substantial holding
provisions. At its worst, the conduct may amount to the passing of
control in circumstances where those investors not engaged in the
conduct are uninformed about this passing of control and are not given
any opportunity to obtain benefits that might need to be paid if control
were to pass legitimately.
RG 128.10 While our guidance aims to reduce uncertainty about the position of
investors when acting collectively, the circumstances of each case need to be
considered individually and there may be other relevant factors that trigger
the takeover and substantial holding provisions.
Scope of this guide
RG 128.11 This guidance is focused on investor engagement with listed companies,
particular listed bodies and listed registered schemes, in relation to which the
takeover and substantial holding provisions will apply. The guidance may
have some more limited relevance to engagement in relation to unlisted
companies with more than 50 members, but the substantial holding
provisions will not apply to these companies.
Page 7
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 7
B Permissible and prohibited conduct
Key points
This section provides guidance on how the takeover and substantial
holding provisions apply to collective action. It also provides practical
guidance to understand our approach to when certain conduct may raise
concerns in relation to compliance with those provisions or otherwise gives
rise to unacceptable circumstances. We have included illustrative examples
of activities that are unlikely or more likely to trigger the provisions.
This section also:
• discusses the consequences of triggering the takeover and substantial
holding provisions or undertaking conduct amounting to unacceptable
circumstances;
• sets out the factors we will consider when deciding whether to review
conduct and take enforcement action; and
• discusses the circumstances in which we might consider giving relief
from the law to allow investors to engage in collective action that would
otherwise be prohibited.
The takeover and substantial holding provisions
RG 128.12 The takeover and substantial holding provisions are triggered when the
following thresholds are met:
(a) the 5% substantial holding threshold—after which a person must
provide substantial holding notices relating to movements above or
below the threshold, and any change of 1% or more in their substantial
holding (Pt 6C.1); and
(b) the 20% takeover threshold—after which acquisitions and offers to
acquire relevant interests in voting shares or interests are only permitted
through certain transactions or in certain circumstances (Ch 6).
RG 128.13 The thresholds are made up of a person’s relevant interest in voting shares or
interests, combined with that of any of their associates. The deemed
economic interest that a person or their associate has in voting shares or
interests may also contribute towards the substantial holding threshold. This
is the case if the person would have a substantial holding if they or their
associate had a relevant interest in the number of voting shares or interests:
see s671D.
RG 128.14 The thresholds for both the takeover and substantial holding provisions
involve similar calculations incorporating two essential elements:
Page 8
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 8
(a) accounting for the votes attached to voting shares or interests in which a
person has a relevant interest; and
(b) the aggregation of the relevant interests in voting shares or interests of a
person and their associates.
As noted in RG 128.13, the threshold for the substantial holding provisions
also accounts for the votes attached to voting shares or interests in which a
person, or their associate, has a deemed economic interest.
RG 128.15 The concepts of a person’s relevant interest and deemed economic interest
revolve around control over voting and disposal of shares or interests.
Because the concepts are concerned with a person’s capacity to exercise a
degree of influence over securities, they encompass connections wider than
ownership. As such, a number of people may have a relevant interest or
deemed economic interest in the same securities in a variety of different
capacities.
Note: See Regulatory Guide 5 Relevant interests and deemed economic interests (RG 5)
for a discussion on when relevant interests and deemed economic interests may arise.
RG 128.16 Depending on the form and circumstances, collective action by investors can
result in the investors acquiring a relevant interest or deemed economic
interest in the shares or interests held by the other investors. For instance,
investors might undertake to each other that they will vote a particular way
in relation to a particular resolution. Investors may also undertake to each
other that they will not dispose of their shares or interests, including shares
or interests arising from an equity derivative, until a particular issue about an
entity’s performance is resolved.
RG 128.17 Even where a particular kind of investor engagement does not result in the
investors acquiring a relevant interest or deemed economic interest in each
other’s securities, the engagement may still be relevant for the purposes of
the takeover or substantial holding provisions. This will most commonly be
the case where the investors’ collective actions do not involve any
arrangement regarding the voting or disposal of shares or interests but
nonetheless results in one or more investors becoming associates.
RG 128.18 An investor can become an associate of another investor under s12(2) if they
propose to:
(a) enter into, or have already entered into, a relevant agreement with the other
investor for the purpose of controlling or influencing the composition of
the entity’s board or the conduct of the entity’s affairs (s12(2)(b)); or
(b) act, or are acting, in concert in relation to the entity’s affairs (s12(2)(c)).
Page 9
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 9
RG 128.19 An association may arise from a relevant agreement or concerted action
relating to matters set out in s53, which include the broad variety of an
entity’s affairs. Therefore, it is possible for the takeover or substantial
holding provisions to apply to collective action by investors relating to a
range of corporate governance matters, which is not necessarily being
undertaken for a control purpose.
RG 128.20 It can sometimes be important when analysing the legal position to
understand that a person does not automatically have a relevant interest or
deemed economic interest in all the shares or interests in which an associate
has a relevant interest or deemed economic interest.
RG 128.21 Detailed guidance in relation to the concepts of ‘relevant interest’, ‘deemed
economic interest’ and ‘associates’ is provided in RG 5: see, in particular,
our guidance in Sections B, C and E.
Substantial holding provisions
RG 128.22 A person has a substantial holding if they and their associates have relevant
interests in voting shares or interests carrying 5% or more of the total votes
attached to all voting shares or interests of a listed entity. This definition
includes relevant interests disregarded under s609(6) (market traded
options), s609(7) (conditional agreements) and s609B (securities subject to
escrow agreement in connection with initial public offer etc.): see the
definition of ‘substantial holding’ in s9 and Table 4 in RG 5.
Note: A person also has a substantial holding if they or their associate has a deemed
economic interest in a number of voting shares or interests that would be a substantial
holding if the person or their associate had a relevant interest in that number and in any
securities in which they actually have a relevant interest: see s671D.
RG 128.23 A person must lodge a substantial holding notice under Pt 6C.1 if they:
(a) begin to have, or cease to have, a substantial holding in a listed entity;
(b) have a substantial holding in an entity at the time the entity is listed on a
declared financial market;
(c) have a substantial holding in a listed entity and there is a disclosable
movement in their holding; or
(d) make a takeover bid for securities of the listed entity: see s671B.
Note: For the definition of ‘disclosable movement’, see s671BK.
RG 128.24 In assessing what level of substantial holding an investor has at any point, it
is important to consider whether any collective action may have caused
another person to be their associate, with the result that the other person’s
relevant interests or deemed economic interests must also be counted.
Page 10
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 10
RG 128.25 The substantial holding provisions require disclosure of the identity of the
associate and, if the association arises as a result of a relevant agreement,
details of the relevant agreement: see s671BB(1)(d).
RG 128.26 The substantial holding notice obligations do not prevent investors in a listed
entity acting collectively. Rather, the obligations ensure that in some cases
the investors will be obliged to disclose their cooperation to the market.
Takeover prohibition
RG 128.27 The takeover prohibition in s606 will be contravened if an investor acquires
a relevant interest in issued voting shares or interests through a transaction in
relation to securities so that it or another person’s voting power in an entity
increases:
(a) from 20% or below to more than 20%; or
(b) from a starting point above 20% and below 90%: see s606(1)–(2).
A person’s voting power is the aggregate of the votes attached to the shares
or interests in which the person and associates of the person have a relevant
interest.
RG 128.28 In determining whether this provision may be breached, an investor needs to
be aware of whether the collective action the investor proposes to undertake
will result in any investors:
(a) acquiring a relevant interest in the shares or interest of another investor
or any other person; and/or
(b) becoming associates of any other investors or any other person.
RG 128.29 The takeover prohibition does not prohibit collective action occurring when:
(a) the investors are not associates and have not acquired a relevant interest
as a result of their engagement and interaction;
(b) the collective action does not involve the acquisition of a relevant
interest because it is conduct that is subject to a specific exclusion under
the Corporations Act (e.g. being appointed as proxy within the terms of
s609(5) or entering into conditional agreement within the terms of
s609(7));
Note: Substantial holding notice disclosure must be made as if the relevant interests
acquired through the conditional agreement are not disregarded: see s671E. There may
of course be other circumstances applicable that mean a relevant interest arises despite
the specific exclusion.
(c) the aggregate voting power of the investors involved in the collective
action is less than 20%; or
Page 11
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 11
(d) despite the aggregate voting power of the investors being more than
20%, no transaction in relation to securities has been entered into, and
no legal or equitable interest in securities has been acquired, that
increases a person’s relevant interest (even if one or more of the
investors have otherwise become associates).
Note: The Corporations Act definition of ‘enter into’ is broadly defined and can include
entering into a relevant agreement in relation to the securities: see s9. The prohibition in
s606(2) also requires the acquisition of a relevant interest in voting shares (or interests),
but not necessarily through a transaction.
RG 128.30 It is important to then consider whether the collective action will affect the
ability of investors to engage in transactions involving the acquisition of
relevant interests in the future. For instance, if an investor’s situation is as
described in RG 128.29(d), it may not be possible for them to acquire more
shares or interests in the entity as a result of the takeover prohibition
applying in the future.
Collective action conduct
RG 128.31 There are a number of collective activities by investors that provide a means
of effectively engaging with an entity but that do not result in an investor
acquiring a relevant interest in someone else’s shares or interests, nor result
in an associate relationship. We recognise the value of these activities in
promoting good corporate governance in Australian entities.
RG 128.32 While in some instances it can be clear whether conduct falls within or
outside the scope of the legal provisions, the nature of concepts like ‘relevant
agreement’ and ‘associate’ means there can be uncertainty about their
application to a range of conduct.
RG 128.33 We have provided some illustrative examples of conduct where collective action
is unlikely (Table 1) or more likely (Table 2) to constitute entry into a relevant
agreement resulting in the acquisition of a relevant interest or triggering an
associate relationship. These examples are illustrative only. The circumstances
of each case need to be considered individually. There may be other relevant
factors that trigger the takeover or substantial holding provisions.
RG 128.34 In addition, when regulating the takeover provisions we also need to
consider the possibility that unacceptable circumstances may exist: see
s657A and Takeovers Panel Guidance Note 1 Unacceptable circumstances
(GN 1). Table 1 and Table 2 also note whether the conduct may give rise to
unacceptable circumstances.
Page 12
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 12
RG 128.35 To the extent that it is ambiguous whether particular conduct is caught by the
takeover and substantial holding provisions or conduct is outside these
provisions, our attitude to whether unacceptable circumstances exist and
enforcement action is warranted will depend on whether it appears that the
conduct has a control purpose and effect, rather than simply promoting good
corporate governance: see RG 128.36–RG 128.42.
Table 1: Conduct unlikely to constitute acting as associates or entering into a relevant
agreement giving rise to a relevant interest
Type of conduct Explanation and analysis of issues
Investors:
holding discussions or meetings
about voting at a specific or proposed
meeting of an entity;
discussing issues about the entity,
including problems and potential
solutions;
discussing possible matters to be
raised with the entity’s board;
discussing and exchanging views on
a resolution to be voted on at a
meeting; or
disclosing individual voting intentions
on a resolution.
If the conduct is confined to the exchange of views or information
between the investors, this is unlikely to give rise to an association,
involve entering into a relevant agreement, or give rise to
unacceptable circumstances, as each investor is not bound to act in
a certain way and retains its own discretion in terms of approach to
an issue.
If the conduct extends to the formulation of joint proposals to be
pursued together, or if there is an understanding that the investors
will act or vote in a particular way, then concerns may arise.
Investors recommending that another
investor votes in a particular way.
This is unlikely to make the investors associates or constitute
entering into a relevant agreement giving rise to a relevant interest if
no undertaking or agreement to follow the recommendation or act in
a particular way is obtained.
Note: This type of conduct may have the benefit of the associate
exclusions set out in s16 (if one entity is providing advice in a professional
capacity to another entity).
The conduct is unlikely to give rise to unacceptable circumstances.
Page 13
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 13
Type of conduct Explanation and analysis of issues
Investors making representations to the
company’s board about the company’s
policies or practices or particular
actions that the company might
consider taking.
If the conduct comprises merely raising the same general issues of
concern raised by other shareholders—either in one-on-one or joint
meetings with the company—in order to understand the company’s
position and discuss alternative viewpoints, then this is unlikely to
result in the investors being associates.
These general issues may range from corporate governance issues
to long-term strategic or commercial risks facing the company. For
instance, dialogue in relation to:
some aspect of executive remuneration, such as the structure of
the company’s incentive schemes; or
forward-looking or long-term strategic matters about how the
entity is positioning itself for the future, taking into account the
specific large-scale risks and trends that are affecting the future of
the industry in which the entity operates.
This conduct is also unlikely to give rise to unacceptable
circumstances, particularly if focused on governance issues.
However, if this forms part of pursuing agreed joint proposals about
the company (or it is suggested) that joint proposals will be pursued
if the company does not give a satisfactory response, then this may
suggest that the investors are associates. If accompanied by overt
threats of some form of collective or coordinated exercise of rights
attached to shares, it can raise concerns that the investors have
acquired relevant interests in each other’s shares via a relevant
agreement.
Making the same representations to the company’s board about a
control transaction proposed by one of the investors, or about
particular transactions that the investors may benefit from over and
above any benefit to shareholders generally, may in particular give
rise to concerns that unacceptable circumstances exist.
Note: These examples are unlikely to give rise to an association or involve entering into a relevant agreement giving rise to a
relevant interest only if the conduct is confined to the actions in the examples and does not go any further.
Page 14
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 14
Table 2: Conduct more likely to constitute acting as associates or entering into a relevant
agreement giving rise to a relevant interest
Type of conduct Explanation and analysis of issues
Investors jointly signing with other
investors:
a s249D notice (or s252B notice in
the case of registered schemes) to
requisition a general meeting of an
entity for the purposes of putting
forward a resolution relating to the
composition of the board or the
entity’s affairs; or
a s249N notice (or s252L notice in
the case of registered schemes) to
request a resolution relating to the
composition of the board or for the
entity’s affairs be considered at a
general meeting of the entity.
Jointly signing a s249D or s249N notice (or a s252B or s252L notice
in the case of registered schemes) in these circumstances is likely
to be considered entering into a relevant agreement and for these
investors to be considered associates. If this is accompanied by an
understanding about the exercise of voting rights, it will also result in
the acquisition of a relevant interest. We expect that this would be
the case in most instances.
We expect that it would be rare for a person to elect to publicly sign
a notice requisitioning a resolution without having formed any
understanding with their co-signatories as to voting. In these cases,
signing a s249D, s249N, s252B or s252L notice will likely give rise
to an association, but may not result in an acquisition of a relevant
interest.
Concerns that unacceptable circumstances could exist may arise
where the subject matter of the resolution:
is the proposed removal of directors to be replaced with new
directors who are aligned with the requisitioning investors (i.e. the
purpose of the resolution is to facilitate the investors pursuing their
plans for the company); or
seeks approval of a transaction (such as a selective buy-back) on
unduly favourable or on non-commercial terms, or a transaction
that has an effect on the ‘control’ of the company.
Investors formulating joint proposals
relating to board appointments or a
strategic issue.
This conduct is likely to indicate that there is an understanding
between the investors on a particular matter relating to the affairs of
the company, which amounts to a relevant agreement or acting in
concert and these investors being considered associates.
Investors:
accepting an inducement to vote or
act in a specific way;
agreeing on a plan concerning voting;
or
limiting their freedom to vote (e.g. by
granting another investor their
irrevocable proxy).
This conduct is likely to constitute entering into a relevant
agreement and for these investors to be considered associates. In
addition, it may give a person control over the votes attached to
shares or interests, resulting in the acquisition of a relevant interest
by that person.
Consequences of problematic collective action
RG 128.36 In some circumstances, collective action conducted by investors will result
in the acquisition of a relevant interest or an associate relationship. The
consequences of this will depend on whether there has been a transaction (or
acquisition of legal or equitable interest) and what the resulting level of
voting power is: see RG 128.28–RG 128.29. Where the resulting voting
power of a person or group is 5% or more, but no more than 20%, and the
Page 15
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 15
collective action results in the acquisition of relevant interest or the
formation of an association, the Corporations Act will require only
disclosure of information. The takeover prohibition potentially applies only
if the voting power of a person or group increases above 20%.
RG 128.37 We will consider enforcement action against investors who act collectively
in breach of the takeover and substantial holding provisions. If investors act
contrary to the underlying principles of Ch 6, we are likely to consider that
unacceptable circumstances have occurred and may refer the matter to the
Takeovers Panel.
RG 128.38 We are likely to look more closely at potential collective action that has the
characteristics set out in Table 3.
Table 3: Conduct that may attract ASIC scrutiny
Control transaction This conduct involves an actual or proposed control transaction, being either a
takeover bid or a transaction of the kind listed in s611.
It is more likely in these circumstances that the collective action is being
undertaken to acquire or maintain control of the entity.
Note: For further guidance regarding joint bids, see Section M of Regulatory Guide 9
Takeover bids (RG 9).
Board control This conduct involves the replacement of directors of a company and other
circumstances involving directing the exercise of the board’s power.
Particularly in circumstances where the proposed directors have a connection with
the investors who may be engaged in collective action, board control activity can
be used as a pathway to control over the entity and more traditional control
transactions. It can also be used to exert illegitimate undisclosed control by using
threats to the position of existing board members to persuade an entity’s board to
make decisions.
We will be particularly concerned by collective action that seeks to change the
composition of the board for the purpose of facilitating the investors proposing the
change pursuing their plans for the company.
Benefits to some
investors only
This conduct concerns proposals that have benefits for particular investors rather
than investors as a whole.
Some of the potential for cooperative investor engagement to increase the long-
term value for all investors will not be realised if only particular investor interests
are served. Generally, entities are cautious about benefiting particular investors
only and investors seeking to obtain these benefits may be more likely to engage
in behaviour to acquire control of, rather than simply make representations about,
entity decision making. Proposals to give investors veto rights (greater than those
carried by the level of their holding) over the entity engaging in particular types of
conduct (e.g. equity fundraising proposals) may be one example of this kind of
benefit.
Page 16
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 16
Pattern of collective
action
The investors involved have a history of collective action in relation to this entity or
other entities that suggest that they act in concert for control purposes.
As finding associations often depends on inferences from circumstances, it is
important to consider the broader history of investors who may be acting
collectively. If there is a long history of investors pursuing joint proposals, it is more
likely that the particular issue where the views of these investors are aligned is not
a common approach to one matter but part of a broader arrangement about
controlling the entity. This kind of history may also mean that it is easier to imply to
the entity that the voting influence of each will be combined.
RG 128.39 In contrast, we are less likely to closely examine collective action that
satisfies all the following criteria:
(a) the subject matter of the collective action relates solely to:
(i) the improvement of the entity’s corporate governance; or
(ii) issues that can properly be determined at a general meeting;
(b) the collective action is temporary and purely related to the resolution of
that issue; and
(c) the collective action is not concerned with the acquisition of a
substantial interest or the exercise of control, and there is no ongoing
undisclosed association between the investors involved.
RG 128.40 Examples of matters that relate solely to the improvement of the entity’s
corporate governance may include encouraging:
(a) better disclosure to the market, including ensuring information
communicated through investor briefings is as widely available as
possible;
(b) more comprehensive board evaluation processes;
(c) more sophisticated risk management systems;
(d) improved sustainability or corporate social responsibility reporting; and
(e) changes to executive remuneration structures.
RG 128.41 We may take action where investors fail to lodge substantial holding notices
when they are required to do so under the Corporations Act or where the
disclosure in the substantial holding notice is inadequate: see Regulatory
Guide 222 Substantial holding disclosure and tracing requirements
(RG 222) for further guidance in relation to substantial holding notices.
RG 128.42 See Section C for other legal considerations under the Corporations Act that
can also arise in relation to collective actions.
Page 17
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 17
Relief
RG 128.43 We are prepared to give relief in circumstances where the collective action
proposed is clearly caught by the takeover provisions, yet the nature of it is
not concerned with the acquisition of a substantial interest or control over
the entity. To the extent we are prepared to grant relief, we will be more
likely to facilitate short-term, specific arrangements that do not include the
provision of consideration. These arrangements more closely resemble the
exception to the relevant interest provisions for proxies.
RG 128.44 We will generally be reluctant to provide relief simply because there is some
residual uncertainty about the legal position of collective action. The
exhaustive analysis of the facts required in such cases, and the need to cast
relief by reference to these facts, is unlikely to result in timely or useful
relief.
RG 128.45 In addition, any relief that we are prepared to give will generally require
disclosure to the market. Given the emphasis in the Corporations Act on
disclosure of substantial holdings and control transactions, we consider that
in most cases the benefits of disclosure to the market outweigh the burden on
the parties involved in making the disclosure.
Page 18
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 18
C Additional legal considerations
Key points
This section identifies several other important legal considerations for
investors and entities involved in investor engagement. These include:
• the prohibition on insider trading;
• shadow directors;
• directors’ duties;
• misleading and deceptive conduct; and
• handling confidential information.
Issues for investors to consider
Insider trading
RG 128.46 An investor that has entered into a voting agreement or discussions with
other investors or with the entity may be in possession of inside information.
For example, the mere existence of a voting agreement or the occurrence of
these discussions may be price-sensitive information.
RG 128.47 Persons possessing information that is price sensitive and not generally
available to the market must not trade for as long as those circumstances
apply. Otherwise they could contravene the insider trading prohibition in
s1043A if they apply for, acquire, or dispose of shares or interests (or enter
into an agreement to do so), or procure another person to apply for, acquire,
or dispose of shares or interests (or enter into an agreement to do so), after
entering into a relevant agreement without informing the market that an
agreement exists: see s1043A and the definition of ‘inside information’ in
s1042A(1). The exceptions in s1043H–1043J (exception for knowledge of
person’s own intentions or activities) are unlikely to apply in these
circumstances.
Shadow directors
RG 128.48 Investors should be mindful of whether their actions result in them effectively
managing the entity. If they do, investors may be acting as shadow directors.
RG 128.49 The definition of ‘director’ in s9AC of the Corporations Act covers both
appointed directors and shadow directors—that is, it includes persons who
have not been appointed directors but:
(a) who act in the position of a director; or
Page 19
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 19
(b) whose wishes or instructions the directors of the company or body are
accustomed to act in accordance with.
As it is possible for the concept of a shadow director to extend beyond
natural persons, investors should be conscious of whether their actions could
constitute a shadow directorship. Liability for directors’ duties imposed by
the Corporations Act extends to shadow directors.
Misleading and deceptive conduct
RG 128.50 Some instances of investor engagement, including collective statements,
occur through statements made by investors publicly, including in the media.
When making public statements, investors should be careful that the
statements are not misleading or deceptive: see s1041H of the Corporations
Act and s12DA of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Act 2001 (ASIC Act).
Issues for entities to consider
Best interests duty
RG 128.51 While we recognise the benefits of directors engaging with investors,
directors have a duty to act in the best interests of the company: see s181(1).
That is, directors have a duty to act in the best interests of the company as a
whole, as opposed to the interest of any individual investor or collection of
investors.
RG 128.52 The responsible entity of a registered scheme, and its officers, also have a
duty to act in the best interests of members: see s601FC(1)(c) and
601FD(1)(c), respectively.
Duty to act for a proper purpose
RG 128.53 Directors have a duty to act for a proper purpose: see s181(1)(b). That is,
directors must use their powers for their intended purpose, not a collateral
purpose. A collateral purpose may include where a director uses their powers
or corporate funds to advance personal interests in responding to an
approach by an investor.
RG 128.54 In election and proxy solicitation cases, which may have commenced
because of collective action by investors, directors may be exceeding or
abusing their powers where they:
(a) expend an unreasonable sum of the entity’s money;
(b) expend corporate funds on material relevant only to questions of
personality and not corporate policy; or
Page 20
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 20
(c) otherwise act in a manner that is excessive or unfair in the
circumstances, given the corporate purpose to be attained.
Confidential information
RG 128.55 Engagement with investors should not be viewed as a way in which those
investors can gain price-sensitive information additional to that already
disclosed to the market as a whole. This type of engagement should instead
focus on investors providing the listed entity with feedback regarding
previously disclosed information or discussion of information that is clearly
not price sensitive.
RG 128.56 While we recognise it is important that listed entities actively engage with
their investors, these entities should be careful that they are not selectively
disclosing confidential, price-sensitive information when doing so. This
could constitute a breach of the entity’s continuous disclosure obligations
under the ASX Listing Rules and the Corporations Act, and creates the risk
of insider trading.
Note: See Handling corporate information on the ASIC website for more information
and resources about handling confidential information.
Misleading and deceptive conduct
RG 128.57 As noted at RG 128.50, some instances of investor engagement occur
through statements made by investors publicly, including in the media.
Companies should be careful when making public statements in response to
investor communications to the market that the statements are not
misleading or deceptive: see s1041H of the Corporations Act and s12DA of
the ASIC Act.
Note: Regulatory Guide 25 Takeovers: False and misleading statements (RG 25)
provides guidance to market participants (bidders, targets and substantial holders) in
relation to making public statements during takeover bids.
Page 21
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 21
Key terms
Term Meaning in this document
ASIC Australian Securities and Investments Commission
ASIC Act Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act
2001
associates Has the meaning given in s10–17 of the Corporations Act
Ch 6 (for example) A Chapter of the Corporations Act (in this example
numbered 6)
Corporations Act Corporations Act 2001, including regulations made for the
purposes of that Act
declared financial
market
Has the meaning given in s9D(1) of the Corporations Act.
Until the first declaration is made under s9D(2), a market
that was prescribed as a prescribed financial market by
former reg 1.0.02A of the Corporations Regulations is
taken to be a declared financial market: see s1705F
Note: References to ‘prescribed financial market’ or
‘prescribed financial markets’ in any ASIC instrument should
be read as ‘declared financial market’ or ‘declared financial
markets’: see s1705G
deemed economic
interest
Has the meaning given in Div 2 of Pt 6C.1A of the
Corporations Act
Pt 6C.1 (for example) A Part of the Corporations Act (in this example numbered
6C.1)
registered scheme A managed investment scheme that is registered under
s601EB of the Corporations Act
relevant interest Has the meaning given by s9 of the Corporations Act
REP 393 (for
example)
An ASIC report (in this example numbered 393)
RG 9 (for example) An ASIC regulatory guide (in this example numbered 9)
s602 (for example) A section of the Corporations Act (in this example
numbered 602)
substantial holding Has the meaning given in s9 of the Corporations Act
voting power Has the meaning given in s610 of the Corporations Act
Page 22
REGULATORY GUIDE 128: Collective action by investors
© Australian Securities and Investments Commission July 2026 Page 22
Related information
Headnotes
associates, collective action, corporate governance, investor engagement,
investors, listed body, listed company, listed registered scheme, relevant
agreement, relevant interest, substantial holding, takeover, unacceptable
circumstances, voting agreement
Regulatory guides
RG 5 Relevant interests and deemed economic interests
RG 9 Takeover bids
RG 25 Takeovers: False and misleading statements
RG 222 Substantial holding disclosure and tracing requirements
Legislation
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, s12DA
Corporations Act 2001, Ch 6; Pt 6C.1; s9, 12, 16, 53, 64, 181, 249D, 249N,
252B, 252L, 601FC, 601FD, 602, 606, 609, 609, 609, 611, 657A, 671B,
671D, 671BB, 1041H, 1042A, 1043A, 1043H–1043J
Other documents
ASX Listing Rules
GN 1 Unacceptable circumstances
